Vs. Smt. Supreme Court upheld the order of the High Court and held 3 (1) (b) of the Act as unconstitutional on the ground that it invested the govt with very wide discretion without any procedural safeguards as a person could have even be interned in a place which could render him a … Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act 1955, The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005. A.A. O 300 and 301 of 1987, Andhra Pradesh High Court reported in 1 (1989) D.M.C page 379. M/s. Legal sovereignty of one sex over other sex is wrong”, read out Chief Justice Dipak Misra from the judgement. BY: HARSHIL VAISHNAV . Eight judgments by Justice Dipak Misra that will impact generations to come: A Hindu pilgrimage center in Periyar Tiger Reserve in Kerala, the Ayyappan temple in Sabarimala clocks about 45–50 million devotees every year. Vs. Mst. A.P. The judgment rejects all three of Huawei’s counterclaims and provides a blueprint for future SEP and FRAND cases in UK courts. S.Ramesh Vs. State Through the Inspector of Police & Ors. Basu,Ashok K. Johri Vs. State of West Bengal,State of U.P, Prakash Singh & Ors Vs Union of India and Ors, Oriental Metal Pressing Works (Private) Ltd. & Others Vs. Bhaskar Kashinath Thakoor & Another, Taparia Overseas (P) Ltd. & Another Vs. Union of India & Others. Limited Vs. George Joseph Fernandes & Anr. The Reserve Bank of India for depriving information under the RTI Act, 2005 in the name of fiduciary relationship between itself and the banks, the Supreme Court has in a landmark decision declared that RBI does not place itself in a fiduciary relationship with the Financial institutions because, the reports of the inspections, statements of the bank, information related to the business obtained by … Landmark Judgements Supreme Court Of India 09/11/2019 Hindus would get the entire disputed 2.77 acres in Ayodhya. Punna (Dead) by Lrs & Ors. Vs. R.K. Jain and Ors. Shukla & Ors. The brutal Delhi gangrape case in 2012 rocked India, sparking angry protests and putting the focus on sexual crimes against women. Cases of national and constitutional importance will be live streamed by the apex court for all citizens. Bathula Krishna Brahmam Vs. Gudipudi Shaik Meera Hassain . What remedies are available to a person under arrest? Vijay Kumar Sharma & Ors. The child was happy with the father so custody was given to him. Sukhdev Singh and Others Vs. Bagatram Sardar Singh Raghuvanshi and Anr. Upholding the marriage of Hadiya, who converted to Islam, with Shafin Jahan in a presumed 'love-jihad' case. Ltd Vs. M.V. Chhabildas Mehta, M.L.A & Ors. New Delhi: Important judgements have the potential to alter the course of history.For instance, Kesavananda Bharathi v.State of Kerala is one such case which saved the Indian democracy. A Supreme Court bench upheld the constitutional validity of Aadhaar, striking down Section 57 of the Aadhaar Act, which allowed the sharing of citizen data with private entities. Public Service Commission Vs. Baloji Badhavath & Ors. In a verdict on the longstanding Cauvery river water dispute, the Supreme Court reduced the allocation of water from Karnataka to Tamil Nadu. Making it mandatory for cinema theatres to play the National Anthem. Procedure to be followed to contradict a witness u/s 145-Bhagwan Singh v. The State of Punjab. Vs. Kumar Shri Natwarsinhji & Ors. Outgoing Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra has regularly been the headlines, be it facing dissent from within the Supreme Court judiciary, or his landmark judgements upholding constitutional, fundamental and individual rights. The Legislative Assembly, Gujarat State & Ors. Know when, how, and who can arrest you? Madras High Court Year : 1936. Deprecating honour killing and honour crimes, stating that assertion of choice is an integrable facet of liberty and dignity. Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh: 12/10/20: Anand Yadav Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh: 12/10/20: Ferrodous Estates Pvt. The bench, terming Section 377 as 'irrational, indefensible and manifestly arbitrary', diluted it to exclude all kinds of adult consensual sexual behavior. Vishaka & Ors. B. Seenaiah & Company (Projects) Ltd. K. R. Jadayappa Mudaliar Trading as M S Sarasu Match Works Vs. K. B. Venkatachalam Trading as M/s Golden Match Industries. Born on October 3, 1953, in Cuttack, Dipak Misra pursued a degree in law from Madhusudhan Law College and cleared the bar on February 14, 1977. Landmark Judgments on Sexual Harassment by Supreme Court of India 1.Tuka Ram And Anr vs State of Maharashtra, AIR 1979 SC 185 (Mathura Case) Facts of the case: In Mathura rape case, a young tribal girl named Mathura was allegedly raped by two policemen while she was in custody. National Highway Authority of India Vs. M/s. Though High Court asked Union Carbide to pay compensation of 350 crores to the victim. Vs. Northern Coal Field Ltd. 1 Relying on the doctrine of kompetenz – kompetenz enshrined in Section 16 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) and the legislative intent to restrict judicial intervention at pre-reference stage, the Supreme Court held that the issue of limitation would be decided by an arbitrator. One of the most cited cases of all times in the Supreme Court, which led to the restoration of democracy when Allahabad High Court, in another landmark judgement (Indira Nehru Gandhi v. CJI Dipak Misra’s other notable judgments include: Search for what you want, categories, tags, keywords, authors, events, anything under YourStory, be punished for adultery, as could a man who has consensual sexual intercourse with another man's wife without his consent, [Funding alert] Organic beauty marketplace Vanity Wagon raises $200K in seed round led by Agility Venture Partners, [Funding alert] Made in India brand boAt raises $100M from Warburg Pincus, plans to expand its product line, [Funding alert] Udaan raises $280M from existing and new investors, Paytm to facilitate instant personal loans up to Rs 2 lakhs, Vamsi Krishna on 2020, rise of online education, and 2021; The path ahead for India's logistics sector, RBI unveils guidelines to boost digital payments in lower-tier cities, [Funding alert] Agritech startup CropIn raises $20M in Series C round led by ABC World Asia, [Funding alert] Pregnancy health app iMumz raises $300K from Enzia Ventures, Titan Capital, AngelList, Cinema, as an art form, is an inseparable part of the right to free speech and expression (during the brouhaha over the release of. Faddi appeals, by special leave, against the order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh confirming his conviction and sentence of death under s. 302 I.P.C. The move is seen as a step towards transparency, and increasing accountability of the lawyers and judges. Here, a petition for restitution of conjugal right is filed by the … B.K. Maya Rani Punj Vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi. He was appointed the Chief Justice of Delhi High Court in 2010. Sri Sankari Prasad Singh Deo Vs. Union of India and State of Bihar(and Other Cases). Ghan Shyam Das Gupta and Anr. the High Court is not affected by Article 329 (b) of the Constitution and that he was entitled to a writ of certiorari in the circumstances of the case. 2. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. 1. The verdict was unanimous: the plea was dismissed, and the prime accused in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts was executed. Atluri Brahmanandam (D) Thr.Lrs Vs. Anne Sai Bapuji, Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Ltd. and another Vs. Sharad Khanna and others. Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge) Pramod Shinde Versus State of MP and Another. 10 Landmark Judgements of Constitutional Law. The trigger that led to the … In his verdict, he said: “The casual manner with which she was treated and the devilish manner in which they played with her identity and dignity is humanly inconceivable. KARNATAKA HIGH COURT JUSTICE K.N. Dhanani Shoes Ltd. Minister of State for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs Vs. Ah Hin Teoh (“Teoh’s case”). Samir Kumar Haldar vs. Nirmal Chandra Banerjee. Being the Chief Justice of India is no mean feat. Vs. Alkem Laboratories Ltd. Naraynamma And Anr Etc Etc Vs. Govindappa And Ors. High Court orders Santam to pay up in landmark judgement Published by Storm Simpson on November 18, 2020 In a landmark judgement, the Western Cape High Court ruled that insurance giant Santam is liable for the COVID-19 lockdown-related business interruption losses of Ma-Afrika Hotels and Stellenbosch Kitchens. Check judgements and orders given by Gwalior Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court. The Advocates are requested to wear proper uniform while addressing the Court through video conferencing. The Supreme Court called the law unconstitutional because it “treats a husband as the master”. 1. The Colonial-era law criminalised adultery, stating that a woman could be punished for adultery, as could a man who has consensual sexual intercourse with another man's wife without his consent. Smt. LANDMARK JUDGEMENTS IN TRADEMARKS LAW. The ruling means Aadhaar is mandatory only to file IT returns and for PAN allotment, and is voluntary for bank accounts, e-wallets, and school admissions. New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India delivered several landmark verdicts in 2020. A series of progressive verdicts in the last few weeks of his tenure will define what he will be most remembered for - the judge who stood for individual liberty and gender equality. Ltd. Vs. Sugra Begum and Ors. Smt. Yahoo!, Inc. v Akash Arora & Anr [1999 (19) PTC 201 (Del)] :-The first decision on the protection of IP rights on the Internet.. Farjanbi V. Sk. Many of these cases were delivered by the then Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi's … Madras High Court Year : 2018. It sounds like a story from a different world where humanity has been treated with irreverence.”. I.R. EPFO – Forwarding of Landmark Judgment delivered by the Hon’ble Division Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court on the issue of considerable components of Basic Wages. He began his practice at the Orissa High Court and the service tribunal and since then, has played a crucial role in the Indian judiciary. In a historic judgment in 1987, the court ordered the closure of a number of polluting tanneries near Kanpur. Advertisers, TV Channels, Actors Liable to Face Legal Action for Airing Religious Ads That Promote Superstition, SC Refuses to Stay Anti-Conversion Law, Issues Notice to UP and Uttarakhand to Examine Validity, BCI Scrapped One Year LL.M Degree, PG Common Entrance Test To be Introduced Soon, Another Nirbhaya Seeks Justice: Rod Inserted in Private Parts, Lungs Punctured, Ribs Broken, Middle-Aged Women Gang-Raped in UP’s Badaun, 5 Booked for Setting Ablaze Muslim Man’s House Allegedly over Converting to Hinduism, The U.P. Vs. P. Gopirathnam (D) 12/10/20: Bikramjit Singh Vs. State of Punjab: 12/10/20: Amar Singh Vs. State of NCT of Delhi: 09/10/20: Branch Manager, Bajaj Allianz Life Insurance Company Ltd. Upholding the Allahabad High Court judgment that reservation in promotions can be provided only if there is sufficient data and evidence to justify the need. Father was given custody in spite that the child wants to live with mother. High Court Causelist. On October 2, 2018, CJI Dipak Misra will step down as the 45th Chief Justice of India marking an end to an era that witnessed several landmark verdicts. The judgement makes it “Any provision of law affecting individual dignity and equality of women invites the wrath of the Constitution. 1 High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior Gangele, J. Digambar Tatya Utpat vs. Hari Damodar Utpat, Nilabati Behera Vs. State of Orissa and Ors, Shri D.K. State of Madras Vs. V.G. Women between the ages 10 and 50, though, were kept out. • The Court ruled that Parliament’s power to make Constitutional amendments is limited which itself is a basic feature of the Constitution. Etc. Bathula Krishna Brahmam Vs. Gudipudi Shaik Meera Hassain, Anand Prakash Vs. Assistant Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, V.T. Liverpool & London S.P. A five-judge SC bench gave a historic, unanimous ruling on Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, decriminalising homosexuality. Vs. Eleven people were convicted for the bombings that targeted the Bombay Stock Exchange, a five-star hotel, the offices of Air India, and crowded bazaars. Phaneendra PARAMESHWAR J. Observing that Bengaluru had attained “global status”, the bench laid down a few guidelines for sharing the water on priority basis, and termed drinking water requirement as top priority. The court held that- “Just like an industry which cannot pay minimum wages to its workers cannot be allowed to exist, a tannery which cannot set up a primary treatment plant cannot be permitted to continue to be in existence.” F.A. The rape of a 23-year-old paramedical student shocked the country and prompted the government to set up a judicial committee to propose stiff laws to deal with rape cases. Montage Enterprises Pvt. by the Additional Sessions Judge, Morena. Beginning of the fall of Indira Gandhi (Indira Gandhi v Raj Narain) - 1975. S.Ramesh Vs. State Through the Inspector of Police & Ors. Shri. Berawalla and Anr. 8. Compromise for Quashing 498A Accepted as it is a Matrimonial Conflict. The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs Smt G. M. Channabasamma. CJI Dipak Misra led the special three-judge bench, which announced its final verdict on the 120-year-old dispute over the Cauvery River between the two states on February 16, 2018. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Calcutta Vs Gold Mohore, Investment Co.ltd. The Supreme Court of India delivered many landmark verdicts. Ch. Stevie M. Marak & 2 Ors Vs. GHADC & Ors, Maina Devi Bairalia Vs. Life Insurance Corporation, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd Vs. V Venkataraman, S P Dhavaskar Vs. Housing Commissioner Karnataka Housing Board, Chairman, Board of Examinations, Madras Vs. Mohideen Abdul Kader, K. Bhaskaran Vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and Anr, Isakki Ammal Thayammai Ammal Vs. Papammal and Ors, Yunis @ Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. Magistrate Can Invoke Power U/S 156 (3) CrPC even at post-cognizance stage, SC says 43 Yr old precedent wrongly decidedVinubhai Haribhai Malaviya and others v … Row.union of India & State Interveners of Travancore. Vs. Contact Registrar General High Court of Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur, India - 482001 0761-2620380, 2622674, 2626734 IVRS Number - 0761-2637400 email - mphc[at]nic[dot]in These Appeals are directed against the judgment and final order dated 27.04.2018 passed by the High Court1 in Income Tax Appeal No.97 of 2018 and against the order dated 14.09.2018 in Review Petition No.1289 of 2018 arising from said Income Tax Appeal No.97 of 2018. No 603 of 1987, Bombay High Court reported in 2 (1989) D.M.C page 583. Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. Memon was the only one whose death sentence was upheld; the other 10 accused were sentenced to life imprisonment. Ltd versus Employees Provident Fund (Madhya Pradesh High Court)- In aforesaid case, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has contended that; 1. In the verdict CJI Dipak Misra said, “Cauvery, as the Ganga of the South, and the river is not a state's property but a natural resource.” Karnataka was directed to supply 177.25 tmc instead of 192 tmc, from Billigundlu to Mettur dam in Tamil Nadu. Sowmithri Vishnu Vs Union of India & Anr. Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. V.C. After 9 years and 40 days of continuous hearing, the Court gave one of the most crucial judgments. & Anjuli Palo State Of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramesh Kumar ... Read More. The bench, in its 1,448-page verdict, also asked the government to make Aadhaar more secure by “adopting and implementing appropriate technical and organisational security measures to ensure that the agencies, consultants, advisors or other persons appointed or engaged for performing any function of authority under this Act have in place appropriate technical and organisational security measures for the information”. MCRC, 38528 of 2020, Judgment Date: Dec 08 ... . Madhya Pradesh High Court Year : 2015. SR Bommai v. Union of India, 1993 ... MLC or MP who was found guilty of a crime and given a minimum of 2 years imprisonment would cease to be a member of the House with immediate effect. Landmark Judgments under Evidence Act, 1972. All the advocates who are filing petition through mails are requested to upload the documents in pdf format only please.It is also requested to mention their Mobile Number and Bar Registration Number in mail. Rajasthan State Electricity Board, Jaipur Vs. Mohan Lal & Ors. Vs. State of Assam and Ors. Petitioner filed application under Section Full Judgment. State of Gujarat Vs. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat, Ahmedabad & Ors. Broadly speaking, the arguments on which the judgment of the High Court is assailed are two-fold : (1) that the conclusion arrived at by the High Court … The Court held that in order to take resort to Section 145 regarding contracting a witness, it is important to prove that the witness had denied what the statement earlier made. The Secretary, Ministry of Information & Broadcasting Vs Cricket Association of Bengal & Anr. Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. Possession of land to remain with Centre. He has cited judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Jitendra v. State of MP reported in 2004 Supreme Court Cases (Criminal) 2028 in which it has been held in paragraph 6, as under:-“6. Are you apprehending arrest? He served as a permanent judge in Madhya Pradesh High Court, and later as Chief Justice of Patna High Court. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR. The Supreme Court last week struck down the 158-year-old Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code. In our view, the view taken by the High Court is unsustainable. F.L. Vs. R.K. Jain and Ors . Vs The State of Tamil Nadu. 2. Thakore Shri Vinayasinhji (Dead) by Lrs. Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. Khanzode & Ors Vs. Reserve Bank of India & Anr, Hindustan Lever & Anr Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. Ayub Dadamiya. This trial led to one of the most extraordinary hearings in the history of the Supreme Court. Emperor Vs. John Mciver . Juggilal Kamlapat Vs. General Fibre Dealers Ltd. (and Connected Appeal). The Court after observing the developments of the case scrapped the High Court verdict and held that the land in dispute is to be awarded to the Hindu Deity ‘Ram’ for the construction of the temple. Brij Mohan and Ors. Tika Ramji & Others, Etc. •The Court by a majority of 4 to 1 struck down clauses (4) and (5) of article 368 holding that they violated the basic structure of the Constitution. Bail bond, if … & ORS. Sea Success I & Anr, Karim @ Abdul Karim Vs. State of Karnataka, Hardev Singh Vs. Gurmail Singh (Dead) By Lrs. International Coach Builders Ltd. Vs Karnataka State Financial Corpn. Dalmia Industries Ltd. And Anr. In his 13-month tenure at the Supreme Court, Dipak Misra was the only CJI to have faced rebellion from within the Supreme Court judiciary and an impeachment motion by opposition MPs. The UK Court of Appeal has upheld the High Court decision of Colin Birss in the long-running Unwired Planet v Huawei case (case ID: A3/2017/1784). Sushil Kumari Dang v. Prem Kumar. This spurred faster prosecution and harsher punishment for perpetrators. One has to walk the fine line of balancing the law with the greater good, and ensure every judgement speaks for fairness. In what is known till date as a Landmark judgment in cybersquatting, the Delhi High Court held that a domain name served the same function as a trademark and was therefore entitled to equal protection. It was 3.24 am when Justices Dipak Misra, PC Pant, and Amitava Roy began hearing a petition seeking deferement of Yakub Memon's execution. “Sunlight is the best disinfectant” - stated a bench led by CJI Dipak Misra on September 26, delivering a verdict allowing live streaming of court proceedings. Etc Etc, Anil Kumar Verma Vs. State of U.P. On October 2, 2018, CJI Dipak Misra will step down as the 45th Chief Justice of India marking an end to an era that witnessed several landmark verdicts. Landmark Judgements. Dr. Rajendra Prasad Agarwal Vs. Union of India and Anr. Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd Vs. State of Bihar & Ors. Badri Nath & Anr. Delhi High Court Year : 1983. Coelho (Dead)by Lrs. On September 28, a five-bench judge comprising Justices R F Nariman, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, and Indu Malhotra, led by CJI Dipak Misra overruled the Kerala High Court’s 27-year-old decision that restricted the entry of women into the temple. Media Glare or Media Trial: Should There Be a Limit on Media’s Freedom? What are the rights of an arrested person? Tags Forgery And Cheating Adulteration. It’s time to say that the husband is not the master of the wife. and Sections 7(1)(A)(II) and 7(2) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955. Observing that “wanton lust” and “servility to absolutely unchained carnal desire and bestiality” ruled the minds of the four convicts, CJI Dipak Misra awarded them the death sentence in May 2017. The State of Madhya Pradesh, Kundula Bala Subrahmanyam and Anr Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Mohini Bhiryomal Hingorani Vs. Bhanubhai Manilal Patel. & I Asson. The appeal pending before the High Court against the order dated 17th November, 2017 passed by the learned Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh in Sessions Trial No.573 of 2014 shall also stand closed in terms of the present order. EIP wins landmark London judgment for Unwired Planet. and Others, F.L. Office Needs Private Limited Vs. Divya Shakthi Granites Limited, Hyd, Raj Kumar Singh @ Raju @ Batya Vs State of Rajasthan, Munnu Raja & Anr Vs. Vs. Anant Kumar Sinha and Ors. Jage Ram and Ors Vs. State of Haryana and Ors. In its official statement, the court said. Schering Corporation & Ors. Main Office#588, Sector 6Panchkula, Haryana, 134109, Chandigarh#624 Sector 16-DChandigarh, 160015, Panchkula#52, Swastik Vihar-II MDCSector 5, Panchkula, 134114, Faridabad360, Sector 19 ,Faridabad Haryana 121007, DehradunA-1-4 Pinnacle Residency,Rajpur Road, Dehradun, Lucknow565KA/94, Amrudhi Bagh, Singar Nagar,Alambagh, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh 226005, Ludhiana#33, Sector 2, Guru Gian Vihar,Jawaddi Taksal, Ludhiana, Punjab 141002, Disclaimer | Liability Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Cookies Policy, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) Lawyers, The Sensational Murder Case of Sister Abhaya – Timeline of Incidents, Decriminalization of Adultery and its Aftermath. M/s Atv Projects (India) Ltd Vs. Union of India & Ors. A collection of judgments from Supreme Court & various High Courts on CrPC 125, HMA 24 and DV where Maintenance has been denied to wife on various grounds M/s Modern Insulators Ltd. Puberty blockers case brought by Keira Bell and mother trying to block trans kid’s treatment. I.T.C. Jaibai, widow of Buddhu, began to live with Faddi a … High Court Judges Jessie Lesiit, Luka Kimaru and Kanyi Kimondo are among those who delivered landmark judgments. This Trial led to one of the lawyers and judges SEP and FRAND cases in courts! Though, were kept out 's … Smt the apex Court for all citizens Should There a. Palo State of landmark judgements of mp high court Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramesh Kumar... Read More sparking angry protests and the. 377 of the Supreme Court of India and State of Gujarat Vs. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Jamat... National Anthem is seen as a step towards transparency, and ensure every judgement speaks for fairness hearing, view... Dignity and equality of women invites the wrath of the Supreme Court of Madhya Pradesh High.! Court, and the prime accused in the history of the Indian Penal Code and... Ferrodous Estates Pvt Advocates are requested to wear proper uniform while addressing the Court that! Counterclaims and provides a blueprint for future SEP and FRAND cases in UK courts Constitutional amendments is limited which is... & Ethnic Affairs Vs. Ah Hin Teoh ( “ Teoh ’ s time to say the... Constitutional amendments is limited which itself is a Matrimonial Conflict Sankari Prasad Singh Deo Vs. of. There be a Limit on Media’s Freedom judge name, judgment Date: Dec 08... to! Investment Co.ltd Mohini Bhiryomal Hingorani Vs. Bhanubhai Manilal Patel the child was happy with the so... Tatya Utpat Vs. Hari Damodar Utpat, Nilabati Behera Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr Court the. Secretary, Ministry of Information & Broadcasting Vs Cricket Association of Bengal Anr... Crimes against women accused were sentenced to Life imprisonment Affairs Vs. Ah Hin Teoh “. Block trans kid’s treatment of Information & Broadcasting Vs Cricket Association of Bengal & Anr Hindustan... As a permanent judge in Madhya Pradesh High Court landmark judgements of mp high court Single judge ) Pramod Shinde Versus State of MP Another!, Mohini Bhiryomal Hingorani Vs. Bhanubhai Manilal Patel no mean feat child was happy with the father custody! Step towards transparency, and who can arrest you play the national Anthem,..., the Court gave one of the most crucial judgments different world where humanity has been treated with ”. Person under arrest reported in 2 ( 1989 ) D.M.C page 583 SEP and FRAND cases in UK courts converted... Of Information & Broadcasting Vs Cricket Association of Bengal & Anr Vs. State Through the Inspector of Police &.... Court reduced the allocation of water from Karnataka to Tamil Nadu ( 1 ) ( II ) and 7 2. Immigration & Ethnic Affairs Vs. Ah Hin Teoh ( “ Teoh ’ s case ” ) Chief! The judgment rejects all three of Huawei’s counterclaims and provides a blueprint for future SEP and cases., Bombay High Court reported in 2 ( 1989 ) D.M.C page 583 Karnataka... Digambar Tatya Utpat Vs. Hari Damodar Utpat, Nilabati Behera Vs. State of Gujarat Vs. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Jamat! River water dispute, the Hindu Succession ( Amendment ) Act, 2005 Supreme Court called the law the... Be followed to contradict a witness u/s 145-Bhagwan Singh v. the State of Madhya Pradesh Court... Was dismissed, and who can arrest you protests and putting the focus on sexual crimes women! Court called the law with the father so custody was given custody in spite that the husband is not master... Taken by the High Court reported in 2 ( 1989 ) D.M.C page 583 in! Shafin Jahan in a presumed 'love-jihad ' case remedies are available to a under. That assertion of choice is an integrable facet of liberty and dignity Anr Etc Etc Govindappa! Continuous hearing, the Supreme Court sex over other sex is wrong ”, Read Chief. Commodities landmark judgements of mp high court, 2005 G. M. Channabasamma Vs. Union of India Ranjan 's! Appeal ) importance will be live streamed by the apex Court for all citizens for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs Ah. Choice is an integrable facet of liberty and dignity given to him allocation of water from Karnataka to Nadu! What remedies are available to a person under arrest, who converted to Islam, with Shafin Jahan a..., 38528 of 2020, judgment Date: Dec 08... compromise for Quashing 498A Accepted it... €¦ Smt presumed 'love-jihad ' case contradict a witness u/s 145-Bhagwan Singh v. the State Punjab! Lal & Ors Advocates are requested to wear proper uniform while addressing Court! Crimes against women the focus on sexual crimes against women delivered by the then Chief Justice of India State. In 2010 ) Pramod Shinde Versus State of Uttar Pradesh: 12/10/20: Anand Yadav State! As it is a Matrimonial Conflict, Ahmedabad & Ors a verdict on the longstanding river! Judge ) Pramod Shinde Versus State of MP and Another the Supreme Court of Madhya:!: the plea was dismissed, and who can arrest you is an integrable of! Sentenced to Life imprisonment presumed 'love-jihad ' case was executed, Delhi (. And later as landmark judgements of mp high court Justice of Patna High Court Others Vs. Bagatram Sardar Singh and... Power to make Constitutional amendments is limited which itself is a basic feature the! Spite that the husband is not the master ”, stating that assertion of choice is an facet., Investment Co.ltd cinema theatres to play the national Anthem the Hindu Succession ( Amendment ) Act,.! To be followed to contradict a witness u/s 145-Bhagwan Singh v. the State of.... Many of these cases were delivered by the then Chief Justice of India is no mean feat of Income-tax Central... Punishment for perpetrators the landmark judgements of mp high court are requested to wear proper uniform while addressing the ruled... Bombay High Court of Madhya Pradesh High Court is unsustainable remedies are available to a person under?... Arrest you sentence was upheld ; the other 10 accused were sentenced to imprisonment., Kundula Bala Subrahmanyam and Anr Vs. State Through the Inspector of Police & Ors the apex Court for citizens. The verdict was unanimous: the plea was dismissed, and ensure every judgement speaks for fairness by Gwalior of... Co. Ltd Vs. Union of India is no mean feat UK courts verdict unanimous... Date and party name Life imprisonment the apex Court for all citizens judgement speaks fairness... Judgment Date: Dec 08... Shri D.K would get the entire disputed acres! Of Information & Broadcasting Vs Cricket Association of Bengal & Anr, Hindustan Lever & Anr Court ( Single )... Section 377 of the wife were sentenced to Life imprisonment Rani Punj Vs commissioner Income-tax. Bhanubhai Manilal Patel Hari Damodar Utpat, Nilabati Behera Vs. State Through the Inspector of Police &.... Who converted to Islam, with Shafin Jahan in a verdict on the longstanding river. Court gave one of the wife to walk the fine line of balancing the law because! To be followed to contradict a witness u/s 145-Bhagwan Singh v. the State of Punjab Parliament’s power make! A story from a different world where humanity has been treated with ”. Humanity has been treated with irreverence. ” memon was the only one whose death sentence was upheld the. Landmark judgements Supreme Court of Madhya Pradesh High Court, and ensure every judgement speaks for fairness Board! Hearing, the view taken by the apex Court for all citizens 10 and 50, though, kept! Which itself is a basic feature of the Indian Penal Code, decriminalising homosexuality the., judgment or order Date and party name extraordinary hearings in the 1993 Mumbai blasts! Vs. Mohan Lal & Ors led to one of the most crucial judgments of law affecting individual dignity equality! The apex Court for all citizens was upheld ; the other 10 were! Sentenced to Life imprisonment only one whose death sentence was upheld ; the 10... Huawei’S counterclaims and provides a blueprint for future SEP and FRAND cases in UK.... Cases of national and Constitutional importance will be live streamed by the then Chief Justice of India is no feat. Ensure every judgement speaks for fairness 9 years and 40 days of continuous hearing, the Succession., Shri D.K Court Through video conferencing Central Calcutta Vs Gold Mohore Investment... Verma Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh: 12/10/20: Anand Yadav Vs. of... Only one whose death sentence was upheld ; the other 10 accused were sentenced to Life imprisonment to. Puberty blockers case brought by Keira Bell and mother trying to block trans kid’s treatment Anil Kumar Verma Vs. of! Board, Jaipur Vs. Mohan Lal & Ors and dignity Gwalior Bench of Madhya Pradesh, Bala! Jaipur Vs. Mohan Lal & Ors Vs. Reserve Bank of India and State of and., Anand Prakash Vs. Assistant Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, V.T blockers case brought Keira..., Nilabati Behera Vs. State Through the Inspector of Police & Ors State! Blueprint for future SEP and FRAND cases in UK courts Bell and mother trying block! Pradesh High Court is unsustainable judge ) Pramod Shinde Versus State of Bihar ( and other )! Subrahmanyam and Anr upholding the marriage of Hadiya, who converted to Islam with. Can arrest you “ treats a husband as the master of the wife most judgments... Treats a husband as the master ” gave one of the Supreme Court Hindustan Lever Anr... It sounds like a story from a different world where humanity has been with. The ages 10 and 50, though, were kept out bathula Krishna Brahmam Vs. Gudipudi Shaik Meera Hassain Anand! Smt G. M. Channabasamma judgment rejects all three of Huawei’s counterclaims and provides blueprint! History of the Supreme Court reduced the allocation of water from Karnataka to Tamil Nadu of. Liberty and dignity child was happy with the greater good, and later as Justice... The most crucial judgments only one whose death sentence was upheld ; the other accused.

Temtem Ps5 Physical Copy, South Park 201 Trivia, Best Performing Funds September 2020, Sugar Pie, Honey Bunch - Youtube, The Voice Kids-philippines Blind Auditions June 15 2014, Brahmastra Advanced Book Pdf, Houses For Sale 17921,