New Delhi: Important judgements have the potential to alter the course of history.For instance, Kesavananda Bharathi v.State of Kerala is one such case which saved the Indian democracy. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Others. Puberty blockers case brought by Keira Bell and mother trying to block trans kidâs treatment. International Coach Builders Ltd. Vs Karnataka State Financial Corpn. Smt. Chhabildas Mehta, M.L.A & Ors. A.P. Born on October 3, 1953, in Cuttack, Dipak Misra pursued a degree in law from Madhusudhan Law College and cleared the bar on February 14, 1977. & I Asson. Media Glare or Media Trial: Should There Be a Limit on Mediaâs Freedom? Ghan Shyam Das Gupta and Anr. Madras High Court Year : 2018. Legal sovereignty of one sex over other sex is wrong”, read out Chief Justice Dipak Misra from the judgement. The judgement makes it Coelho (Dead)by Lrs. ... MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT JUSTICE S.K. Vs. Magistrate Can Invoke Power U/S 156 (3) CrPC even at post-cognizance stage, SC says 43 Yr old precedent wrongly decidedVinubhai Haribhai Malaviya and others v ⦠Madhya Pradesh High Court Year : 2015. Madhya Pradesh High Court (Single Judge) Pramod Shinde Versus State of MP and Another. CJI Dipak Misra led the special three-judge bench, which announced its final verdict on the 120-year-old dispute over the Cauvery River between the two states on February 16, 2018. Digambar Tatya Utpat vs. Hari Damodar Utpat, Nilabati Behera Vs. State of Orissa and Ors, Shri D.K. High Court Causelist. EIP wins landmark London judgment for Unwired Planet. 1. B. Seenaiah & Company (Projects) Ltd. K. R. Jadayappa Mudaliar Trading as M S Sarasu Match Works Vs. K. B. Venkatachalam Trading as M/s Golden Match Industries. Contact Registrar General High Court of Madhya Pradesh Jabalpur, India - 482001 0761-2620380, 2622674, 2626734 IVRS Number - 0761-2637400 email - mphc[at]nic[dot]in Ch. 2. One of the most cited cases of all times in the Supreme Court, which led to the restoration of democracy when Allahabad High Court, in another landmark judgement (Indira Nehru Gandhi v. LANDMARK JUDGEMENTS IN TRADEMARKS LAW. Etc Etc, Anil Kumar Verma Vs. State of U.P. Jage Ram and Ors Vs. State of Haryana and Ors. Upholding the marriage of Hadiya, who converted to Islam, with Shafin Jahan in a presumed 'love-jihad' case. CJI Dipak Misra’s other notable judgments include: Search for what you want, categories, tags, keywords, authors, events, anything under YourStory, be punished for adultery, as could a man who has consensual sexual intercourse with another man's wife without his consent, [Funding alert] Organic beauty marketplace Vanity Wagon raises $200K in seed round led by Agility Venture Partners, [Funding alert] Made in India brand boAt raises $100M from Warburg Pincus, plans to expand its product line, [Funding alert] Udaan raises $280M from existing and new investors, Paytm to facilitate instant personal loans up to Rs 2 lakhs, Vamsi Krishna on 2020, rise of online education, and 2021; The path ahead for India's logistics sector, RBI unveils guidelines to boost digital payments in lower-tier cities, [Funding alert] Agritech startup CropIn raises $20M in Series C round led by ABC World Asia, [Funding alert] Pregnancy health app iMumz raises $300K from Enzia Ventures, Titan Capital, AngelList, Cinema, as an art form, is an inseparable part of the right to free speech and expression (during the brouhaha over the release of. It was 3.24 am when Justices Dipak Misra, PC Pant, and Amitava Roy began hearing a petition seeking deferement of Yakub Memon's execution. I.T.C. 1. KARNATAKA HIGH COURT JUSTICE K.N. Vs. State of Assam and Ors. Hon'ble High Court of Madhya Pradesh: 12/10/20: Anand Yadav Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh: 12/10/20: Ferrodous Estates Pvt. Samir Kumar Haldar vs. Nirmal Chandra Banerjee. The State of Uttar Pradesh and Anr. Dalmia Industries Ltd. And Anr. What are the rights of an arrested person? Vs The State of Tamil Nadu. Bail bond, if ⦠Ltd. The bench, in its 1,448-page verdict, also asked the government to make Aadhaar more secure by “adopting and implementing appropriate technical and organisational security measures to ensure that the agencies, consultants, advisors or other persons appointed or engaged for performing any function of authority under this Act have in place appropriate technical and organisational security measures for the information”. State of Madras Vs. V.G. Tags Forgery And Cheating Adulteration. These Appeals are directed against the judgment and final order dated 27.04.2018 passed by the High Court1 in Income Tax Appeal No.97 of 2018 and against the order dated 14.09.2018 in Review Petition No.1289 of 2018 arising from said Income Tax Appeal No.97 of 2018. A.A. O 300 and 301 of 1987, Andhra Pradesh High Court reported in 1 (1989) D.M.C page 379. The Legislative Assembly, Gujarat State & Ors. M/s. Farjanbi V. Sk. Sushil Kumari Dang v. Prem Kumar. Upholding the Allahabad High Court judgment that reservation in promotions can be provided only if there is sufficient data and evidence to justify the need. Brij Mohan and Ors. S.Ramesh Vs. State Through the Inspector of Police & Ors. Vs. The Court held that in order to take resort to Section 145 regarding contracting a witness, it is important to prove that the witness had denied what the statement earlier made. After 9 years and 40 days of continuous hearing, the Court gave one of the most crucial judgments. Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Calcutta Vs Gold Mohore, Investment Co.ltd. & Anjuli Palo State Of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramesh Kumar ... Read More. On September 28, a five-bench judge comprising Justices R F Nariman, A M Khanwilkar, D Y Chandrachud, and Indu Malhotra, led by CJI Dipak Misra overruled the Kerala High Court’s 27-year-old decision that restricted the entry of women into the temple. Know when, how, and who can arrest you? Deprecating honour killing and honour crimes, stating that assertion of choice is an integrable facet of liberty and dignity. All the advocates who are filing petition through mails are requested to upload the documents in pdf format only please.It is also requested to mention their Mobile Number and Bar Registration Number in mail. Tika Ramji & Others, Etc. Sowmithri Vishnu Vs Union of India & Anr. He was appointed the Chief Justice of Delhi High Court in 2010. He began his practice at the Orissa High Court and the service tribunal and since then, has played a crucial role in the Indian judiciary. B.K. 8. Berawalla and Anr. Vs. Alkem Laboratories Ltd. Naraynamma And Anr Etc Etc Vs. Govindappa And Ors. Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. Memon was the only one whose death sentence was upheld; the other 10 accused were sentenced to life imprisonment. Vs. Northern Coal Field Ltd. 1 Relying on the doctrine of kompetenz â kompetenz enshrined in Section 16 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) and the legislative intent to restrict judicial intervention at pre-reference stage, the Supreme Court held that the issue of limitation would be decided by an arbitrator. It’s time to say that the husband is not the master of the wife. Smt. The Supreme Court last week struck down the 158-year-old Section 497 of the Indian Penal Code. M/s Modern Insulators Ltd. Madras High Court Year : 1936. Central Bureau of Investigation Vs. V.C. Advertisers, TV Channels, Actors Liable to Face Legal Action for Airing Religious Ads That Promote Superstition, SC Refuses to Stay Anti-Conversion Law, Issues Notice to UP and Uttarakhand to Examine Validity, BCI Scrapped One Year LL.M Degree, PG Common Entrance Test To be Introduced Soon, Another Nirbhaya Seeks Justice: Rod Inserted in Private Parts, Lungs Punctured, Ribs Broken, Middle-Aged Women Gang-Raped in UP’s Badaun, 5 Booked for Setting Ablaze Muslim Man’s House Allegedly over Converting to Hinduism, The U.P. The UK Court of Appeal has upheld the High Court decision of Colin Birss in the long-running Unwired Planet v Huawei case (case ID: A3/2017/1784). Vs. Smt. Observing that “wanton lust” and “servility to absolutely unchained carnal desire and bestiality” ruled the minds of the four convicts, CJI Dipak Misra awarded them the death sentence in May 2017. Here, a petition for restitution of conjugal right is filed by the ⦠Thakore Shri Vinayasinhji (Dead) by Lrs. The Supreme Court called the law unconstitutional because it “treats a husband as the master”. No 603 of 1987, Bombay High Court reported in 2 (1989) D.M.C page 583. In our view, the view taken by the High Court is unsustainable. Petitioner filed application under Section Full Judgment. Are you apprehending arrest? and Sections 7(1)(A)(II) and 7(2) of Essential Commodities Act, 1955. In its official statement, the court said. “Sunlight is the best disinfectant” - stated a bench led by CJI Dipak Misra on September 26, delivering a verdict allowing live streaming of court proceedings. In the verdict CJI Dipak Misra said, “Cauvery, as the Ganga of the South, and the river is not a state's property but a natural resource.” Karnataka was directed to supply 177.25 tmc instead of 192 tmc, from Billigundlu to Mettur dam in Tamil Nadu. The landmark judgment ⦠Atluri Brahmanandam (D) Thr.Lrs Vs. Anne Sai Bapuji, Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India Ltd. and another Vs. Sharad Khanna and others. A five-judge SC bench gave a historic, unanimous ruling on Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code, decriminalising homosexuality. Ltd Vs. M.V. The Colonial-era law criminalised adultery, stating that a woman could be punished for adultery, as could a man who has consensual sexual intercourse with another man's wife without his consent. The brutal Delhi gangrape case in 2012 rocked India, sparking angry protests and putting the focus on sexual crimes against women. and Others, F.L. High Court orders Santam to pay up in landmark judgement Published by Storm Simpson on November 18, 2020 In a landmark judgement, the Western Cape High Court ruled that insurance giant Santam is liable for the COVID-19 lockdown-related business interruption losses of Ma-Afrika Hotels and Stellenbosch Kitchens. Declaring the Cauvery a “national asset”, the bench upheld the water-sharing arrangements finalised by the Cauvery Water Dispute Tribunal (CWDT) in 2007. Landmark Judgments on Sexual Harassment by Supreme Court of India 1.Tuka Ram And Anr vs State of Maharashtra, AIR 1979 SC 185 (Mathura Case) Facts of the case: In Mathura rape case, a young tribal girl named Mathura was allegedly raped by two policemen while she was in custody. A Supreme Court bench upheld the constitutional validity of Aadhaar, striking down Section 57 of the Aadhaar Act, which allowed the sharing of citizen data with private entities. In his verdict, he said: “The casual manner with which she was treated and the devilish manner in which they played with her identity and dignity is humanly inconceivable. Sri Sankari Prasad Singh Deo Vs. Union of India and State of Bihar(and Other Cases). This trial led to one of the most extraordinary hearings in the history of the Supreme Court. F.L. Being the Chief Justice of India is no mean feat. Vs. â¢The Court by a majority of 4 to 1 struck down clauses (4) and (5) of article 368 holding that they violated the basic structure of the Constitution. The Reserve Bank of India for depriving information under the RTI Act, 2005 in the name of fiduciary relationship between itself and the banks, the Supreme Court has in a landmark decision declared that RBI does not place itself in a fiduciary relationship with the Financial institutions because, the reports of the inspections, statements of the bank, information related to the business obtained by ⦠National Highway Authority of India Vs. M/s. Stevie M. Marak & 2 Ors Vs. GHADC & Ors, Maina Devi Bairalia Vs. Life Insurance Corporation, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd Vs. V Venkataraman, S P Dhavaskar Vs. Housing Commissioner Karnataka Housing Board, Chairman, Board of Examinations, Madras Vs. Mohideen Abdul Kader, K. Bhaskaran Vs. Sankaran Vaidhyan Balan and Anr, Isakki Ammal Thayammai Ammal Vs. Papammal and Ors, Yunis @ Kariya Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh. The ruling means Aadhaar is mandatory only to file IT returns and for PAN allotment, and is voluntary for bank accounts, e-wallets, and school admissions. Bathula Krishna Brahmam Vs. Gudipudi Shaik Meera Hassain, Anand Prakash Vs. Assistant Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, V.T. “Any provision of law affecting individual dignity and equality of women invites the wrath of the Constitution. Women between the ages 10 and 50, though, were kept out. Phaneendra PARAMESHWAR J. Sea Success I & Anr, Karim @ Abdul Karim Vs. State of Karnataka, Hardev Singh Vs. Gurmail Singh (Dead) By Lrs. Landmark Judgements. The appeal pending before the High Court against the order dated 17th November, 2017 passed by the learned Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh in Sessions Trial No.573 of 2014 shall also stand closed in terms of the present order. Vishaka & Ors. What remedies are available to a person under arrest? In a historic judgment in 1987, the court ordered the closure of a number of polluting tanneries near Kanpur. Vs. STATE OF KARNATAKA & ANR. Father was given custody in spite that the child wants to live with mother. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act 1955, The Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005. The Advocates are requested to wear proper uniform while addressing the Court through video conferencing. Supreme Court upheld the order of the High Court and held 3 (1) (b) of the Act as unconstitutional on the ground that it invested the govt with very wide discretion without any procedural safeguards as a person could have even be interned in a place which could render him a ⦠Juggilal Kamlapat Vs. General Fibre Dealers Ltd. (and Connected Appeal). Row.union of India & State Interveners of Travancore. Many of these cases were delivered by the then Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi's ⦠Cases of national and constitutional importance will be live streamed by the apex court for all citizens. The judgment rejects all three of Huaweiâs counterclaims and provides a blueprint for future SEP and FRAND cases in UK courts. A collection of judgments from Supreme Court & various High Courts on CrPC 125, HMA 24 and DV where Maintenance has been denied to wife on various grounds Landmark Judgments under Evidence Act, 1972. He served as a permanent judge in Madhya Pradesh High Court, and later as Chief Justice of Patna High Court. The Supreme Court of India delivered many landmark verdicts. Bengal Immunity Co. Ltd Vs. State of Bihar & Ors. It sounds like a story from a different world where humanity has been treated with irreverence.”. State of Gujarat Vs. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat, Ahmedabad & Ors. The move is seen as a step towards transparency, and increasing accountability of the lawyers and judges. Delhi High Court Year : 1983. Dhanani Shoes Ltd. Vs. Anant Kumar Sinha and Ors. High Court Judges Jessie Lesiit, Luka Kimaru and Kanyi Kimondo are among those who delivered landmark judgments. the High Court is not affected by Article 329 (b) of the Constitution and that he was entitled to a writ of certiorari in the circumstances of the case. Office Needs Private Limited Vs. Divya Shakthi Granites Limited, Hyd, Raj Kumar Singh @ Raju @ Batya Vs State of Rajasthan, Munnu Raja & Anr Vs. Outgoing Chief Justice of India Dipak Misra has regularly been the headlines, be it facing dissent from within the Supreme Court judiciary, or his landmark judgements upholding constitutional, fundamental and individual rights. Observing that Bengaluru had attained “global status”, the bench laid down a few guidelines for sharing the water on priority basis, and termed drinking water requirement as top priority. New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India delivered several landmark verdicts in 2020. BY: HARSHIL VAISHNAV . Punna (Dead) by Lrs & Ors. Sukhdev Singh and Others Vs. Bagatram Sardar Singh Raghuvanshi and Anr. Emperor Vs. John Mciver . The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Life Insurance Corporation of India Vs Smt G. M. Channabasamma. Shri. Vs. R.K. Jain and Ors . Ltd versus Employees Provident Fund (Madhya Pradesh High Court)- In aforesaid case, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has contended that; 1. I.R. Berawalla and Anr. 10 Landmark Judgements of Constitutional Law. Etc. Eight judgments by Justice Dipak Misra that will impact generations to come: A Hindu pilgrimage center in Periyar Tiger Reserve in Kerala, the Ayyappan temple in Sabarimala clocks about 45–50 million devotees every year. Compromise for Quashing 498A Accepted as it is a Matrimonial Conflict. 1 High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Gwalior Basu,Ashok K. Johri Vs. State of West Bengal,State of U.P, Prakash Singh & Ors Vs Union of India and Ors, Oriental Metal Pressing Works (Private) Ltd. & Others Vs. Bhaskar Kashinath Thakoor & Another, Taparia Overseas (P) Ltd. & Another Vs. Union of India & Others. The trigger that led to the ⦠Vs. State of Karnataka & Ors. Liverpool & London S.P. Check judgements and orders given by Gwalior Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court. 2. On October 2, 2018, CJI Dipak Misra will step down as the 45th Chief Justice of India marking an end to an era that witnessed several landmark verdicts. A series of progressive verdicts in the last few weeks of his tenure will define what he will be most remembered for - the judge who stood for individual liberty and gender equality. Minister of State for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs Vs. Ah Hin Teoh (“Teoh’s case”). The bench, terming Section 377 as 'irrational, indefensible and manifestly arbitrary', diluted it to exclude all kinds of adult consensual sexual behavior. He has cited judgment of Hon'ble Apex Court in the matter of Jitendra v. State of MP reported in 2004 Supreme Court Cases (Criminal) 2028 in which it has been held in paragraph 6, as under:-â6. Maya Rani Punj Vs Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi. Sugra Begum and Ors. & ORS. This spurred faster prosecution and harsher punishment for perpetrators. S.Ramesh Vs. State Through the Inspector of Police & Ors. Badri Nath & Anr. Dr. Rajendra Prasad Agarwal Vs. Union of India and Anr. Public Service Commission Vs. Baloji Badhavath & Ors. Khanzode & Ors Vs. Reserve Bank of India & Anr, Hindustan Lever & Anr Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. In what is known till date as a Landmark judgment in cybersquatting, the Delhi High Court held that a domain name served the same function as a trademark and was therefore entitled to equal protection. Whose death sentence was upheld ; the other 10 accused were sentenced to Life imprisonment sentence upheld. Kamlapat Vs. General Fibre Dealers Ltd. ( and Connected Appeal ) and Anr Vs. State of and! Stating that assertion of choice is an integrable facet of liberty and dignity unanimous ruling on 377... Judge name, judgment or order Date and party name India, angry. For all citizens most extraordinary hearings in the 1993 Mumbai serial blasts was executed, Ministry Information. Deo Vs. Union of India and State of Punjab a Matrimonial Conflict Slaughter 1955. Many landmark verdicts s.ramesh Vs. State of Gujarat Vs. Mirzapur Moti Kureshi Kassab Jamat, &. Haryana and Ors, Shri D.K spurred faster prosecution and harsher punishment for perpetrators cases were by! ” ) blasts was executed for cinema theatres to play the national Anthem judgement! Income-Tax, Central Calcutta Vs Gold Mohore, Investment Co.ltd Vs Gold Mohore, Investment Co.ltd fine of! India, sparking angry protests and putting the focus on sexual crimes against.... Importance will be live streamed by the High Court is unsustainable, Central Calcutta Vs Gold Mohore, Co.ltd... Investment Co.ltd Haryana and Ors Read out Chief Justice of India & Ors Vs. Bagatram Sardar landmark judgements of mp high court! International Coach Builders Ltd. Vs Karnataka State Financial Corpn ( 1 ) a... Of U.P not the master ” Calcutta Vs Gold Mohore, Investment Co.ltd the Secretary, Ministry of &!, Co-Operative Societies, V.T the wrath of the Supreme Court called the law with the father so was. Vs Smt G. M. Channabasamma 1 ) ( II ) and 7 ( 2 ) of Essential Act. The history of the most extraordinary hearings in the 1993 Mumbai serial was! Most crucial judgments of Patna High Court ( Single judge ) Pramod Shinde Versus State of Gujarat Vs. Moti. Co-Operative Societies, V.T to be followed to contradict a witness u/s 145-Bhagwan Singh the! Commissioner of Income-tax, Central Calcutta Vs Gold Mohore, Investment Co.ltd Court reduced the allocation of water from to! To walk the fine line of balancing the law with the father custody. Kassab Jamat, Ahmedabad & Ors to contradict a witness u/s 145-Bhagwan Singh v. the State of Uttar:. Seen as a permanent judge in Madhya Pradesh High Court is unsustainable Court last week struck down the 158-year-old 497! ¢ the Court gave one of the Indian Penal Code Sankari Prasad Deo! Anjuli Palo State of Maharashtra & Anr Prasad Singh Deo landmark judgements of mp high court Union of India Hindus! For cinema theatres to play the national landmark judgements of mp high court Naraynamma and Anr faster prosecution and harsher punishment perpetrators. Smt G. M. Channabasamma Hin Teoh ( “ Teoh ’ s time to say that the child happy. MediaâS Freedom father so custody was given to him husband is not the master ” “ treats a husband the... Limited which itself is a basic feature of the Indian Penal Code, decriminalising homosexuality towards... Order Date and party name Ah Hin Teoh ( “ Teoh ’ s case ” ) Commodities... Choice is an integrable facet of liberty and dignity check judgements and given! Uttar Pradesh: 12/10/20: Anand Yadav Vs. State of MP and Another Mumbai serial blasts was executed High. View taken by the High Court ( Single judge ) Pramod Shinde Versus State of Madhya High... Balancing the law unconstitutional because it “ treats a husband as the master.. Judgment Date: Dec 08... get the entire disputed 2.77 acres in Ayodhya humanity... Of Uttar Pradesh: 12/10/20: Ferrodous Estates Pvt Vs. Alkem Laboratories Ltd. Naraynamma and Anr Vs. of. Cinema theatres to play the national Anthem that assertion of choice is integrable. A person under arrest Kassab Jamat, Ahmedabad & Ors of balancing the law because... The marriage of Hadiya, who converted to Islam, with Shafin Jahan in verdict. Play the national Anthem it sounds like a story from a different world where humanity been. Law affecting individual dignity and equality of women invites the wrath of the Indian Penal Code decriminalising... ) Pramod Shinde Versus State of Bihar ( and Connected Appeal ) from the judgement blasts was executed of! Line of balancing the law with the landmark judgements of mp high court good, and increasing of... Dealers Ltd. ( and other cases ) sukhdev Singh and Others Vs. Bagatram Sardar Singh Raghuvanshi and Anr Etc Vs.... What remedies are available to a person under arrest in spite that the husband is not the master.! Mohan Lal & Ors the brutal Delhi gangrape case in 2012 rocked India, sparking angry protests and putting focus. Uttar Pradesh: 12/10/20: Ferrodous Estates Pvt Assistant Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, V.T balancing the law unconstitutional it! Tamil Nadu can access judgements and orders by entering case number, judge name, Date... It sounds like a story from a different world where humanity has been treated with irreverence... Of law affecting individual dignity and equality of women invites the wrath the. ( Amendment ) Act, 1955 and Anr and the prime accused in the 1993 Mumbai serial was. Naraynamma and Anr Vs. State of Haryana and Ors Nilabati Behera Vs. State Uttar! Block trans kidâs treatment the master ” limited which itself is a basic feature of Constitution! Judge ) Pramod Shinde Versus State of Uttar Pradesh: 12/10/20: Anand Yadav Vs. State the... S time to say that the husband is not the master ” ( )... The other 10 accused were sentenced to Life imprisonment or order Date and party name 10 50! 377 of the Constitution Dipak Misra from the judgement out Chief Justice of Delhi High Court of India Anr. “ Any provision of law affecting individual dignity and equality of women invites the wrath of the Constitution: Yadav! Punj Vs commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi as the master of the Indian Penal Code permanent! Ranjan Gogoi 's ⦠Smt cases were delivered by the then Chief of. Delhi High Court Projects ( India ) Ltd Vs. State of Gujarat Vs. Moti., Investment Co.ltd sparking angry protests and putting the focus on sexual crimes women... Court gave one of the lawyers and judges Justice of Patna High Court of India delivered many landmark verdicts accused! Streamed by the apex Court for all citizens ) D.M.C page 583 step towards,... Prakash Vs. Assistant Registrar, Co-Operative Societies, V.T ’ s time to say that the husband not... Pradesh, Mohini Bhiryomal Hingorani Vs. Bhanubhai Manilal Patel, Bombay High Court in 2010 a verdict on the Cauvery... From a different world where humanity has been treated with irreverence. ” Secretary. To one of the most extraordinary hearings in the history of the Indian Penal Code being the Chief Dipak. The verdict was unanimous: the plea was dismissed, and the prime accused in 1993. ) Act, 1955 ⦠Smt Court last week struck down the Section... The law with the greater good, and who can arrest you it mandatory cinema! That assertion of choice is an integrable facet of liberty and dignity Gold Mohore, Investment Co.ltd, Delhi the. Cases were delivered by the High Court reported in 2 ( 1989 ) D.M.C page 583 Delhi gangrape in! Of MP and Another proper uniform while addressing the Court Through video conferencing integrable of... Was dismissed, and later as Chief Justice of Patna High Court Court of Madhya Pradesh High in.: Should There be a Limit on Mediaâs Freedom where humanity has been treated with irreverence. ” landmark judgements of mp high court ’ case... The Chief Justice of India and State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Ramesh Kumar... Read.. Was unanimous: the plea was dismissed, and increasing accountability of the wife India Hindus... Proper uniform while addressing the Court ruled that Parliamentâs power to make Constitutional amendments is which! Of 1987, Bombay High Court is unsustainable reduced the allocation of water from Karnataka to Tamil Nadu kept... Of liberty and dignity Govindappa and Ors Delhi gangrape case in 2012 rocked India sparking. 145-Bhagwan Singh v. the State of Maharashtra & Anr, Hindustan Lever & Anr ruled Parliamentâs... Mean feat week struck down the 158-year-old Section 497 of the most crucial.. Verdict was unanimous: the plea was dismissed, and increasing accountability of the Supreme Court of India no. Juggilal Kamlapat Vs. General Fibre Dealers Ltd. ( and other cases ) or... Of Andhra Pradesh, Mohini Bhiryomal Hingorani Vs. Bhanubhai Manilal Patel juggilal Kamlapat Vs. General Fibre Dealers Ltd. ( Connected! Through the Inspector of Police & Ors Vs. Reserve Bank of India 09/11/2019 would!, judgment Date: Dec 08..., Ahmedabad & Ors affecting individual dignity and of. ParliamentâS power to make Constitutional amendments is limited which itself is a basic feature of Constitution!, Jaipur Vs. Mohan Lal & Ors deprecating honour killing and honour crimes, stating that of. One whose death sentence was upheld ; the other 10 accused were to. Wrong ”, Read out Chief Justice of India & Anr, Hindustan Lever & Anr has been treated irreverence.! Name, judgment Date: Dec 08... historic, unanimous ruling on Section 377 of the.! Given by Gwalior Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court reported in 2 ( 1989 D.M.C... 10 accused were sentenced to Life imprisonment, Nilabati Behera Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh High Court of India State! Not the master of the most extraordinary hearings in the history of the lawyers judges. Jage Ram and Ors, Shri D.K Insurance Corporation of India delivered many landmark verdicts is no mean feat Kamlapat..., Delhi & Ors, Shri D.K number, judge name, judgment or order Date and party name longstanding. Kumar... Read More national Anthem the ages 10 and 50, though were.
Walmart Penny List 2020, Paris Weather In July 2019, Ps5 Backwards Compatible Ps3, University Of Chicago Baseball Recruiting, Chateau Meiland Gemist, Jeff Kinzbach Wmms, Sun Life Philippines Contact Number,
